Public Accounts and Estimates Committee: budget estimates 2013-14 (part 2) – Delivered in Parl 5 Feb 2014
Mr Pallas (Tarneit) — I refer to part 2 of the Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (PAEC) report on the 2013-14 budget estimates, specifically the finding, outlined on page 44, that states:
- The 2013-14 budget revenue estimate from the fire services property levy in 2013-14 has been revised upwards by $23.6 million.
I refer also to today’s Herald Sun report on the Treasurer’s embarrassing capitulation on just one of the problems with his botched fire services property levy (FSPL). He has finally acknowledged that charging investment unit owners a commercial rate on their property is both ridiculous and unjust. He had the temerity to say the government was:
- … pleased to be able to deliver this relief …
But the pain was of his own making in the first place. This problem, which has been known about almost as long as the levy has been in place, was a result of the Treasurer’s own legislation. People who owned investment units were paying the commercial rate on each and every unit. This was causing six-fold increases and more on what people were previously paying.
These were people who had previously been paying their insurance, despite what the Treasurer would have us believe. The Treasurer is trying to sneak the news through in the hope that this error will slip through unnoticed amid the chaos that is this Parliament.
This is emblematic of the arrogance this government and this Treasurer have been constantly displaying for the six months the levy has been in place. The Treasurer denied there was a problem with the scheme despite the fact that he was hearing about it constantly in the media, in Parliament, in his own office and in correspondence from me and many members of this Parliament and the community who have been aggrieved. At the PAEC hearings he stated:
… I am very confident that Victorians will react well to a reform which sees their fire services put on a far better financial footing.
When he started hearing that some people were being hit ridiculously hard — self-funded retirees in regional Victoria were paying many times more than they had been paying under their insurance — his spokesman accused them of free-riding on the rest of the community for the cost of our fire services, saying that Labor is more interested in defending those who previously failed to pay their fair share towards the funding of our fire services than the millions of Victorians who will pay less each year under these fairer reforms. It was arrogance, ignorance and indifference in equal measure.
On 30 May last year, after I had drawn his attention to the problem, he told this Parliament that he found it extraordinary that Labor — —
Mr Clark — On a point of order, Deputy Speaker, this portion of the business of the house is to deal with committee reports. While the honourable member made initial reference to a committee report, he is now straying far beyond the subject of a committee report and is canvassing entirely separate matters. I ask you to bring him back to the subject of the committee report that he is supposed to be addressing.
The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! I ask the member for Tarneit to come back to the report.
Mr Pallas — The report, in essence, identifies that there was to be an increase in the revenue that the state would be picking up under the fire services levy. The government needs to make further changes to the fire services levy. It needs to recognise that this is a poorly constructed tax that is not living up to its promise to make things fairer and simpler.
Given the surplus in revenue, there is finally capacity for the government to listen and to acknowledge that it botched this tax. The opposition has been clear that there has been a disastrous record of implementation of the 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission recommendations. The Treasurer has tried to deny there is anything wrong. He needs to acknowledge that his arrogance and indifference to the concerns of the people are having a dramatic impact on the way this tax operates.
There is a complete lack of accountability built into this legislation. The funds raised for the FSPL are directed into consolidated revenue. The minister has absolute discretion, which is not reviewable, to set the rates of the levy. Finally, there is no provision for an agency to oversight its implementation.
We call on the Napthine government to expand the powers of the fire services levy monitor to be able to review the operation of the new levy and make recommendations on what changes could be made to make it live up to the ‘fairer’ label that the government has inaccurately tried to attach to it. So far there has been no action. We introduced a private members bill, but it was rejected. We repeat our call for the government to undertake a review of the fire services property levy rather than engaging in piecemeal backflips.