Public Accounts and Estimates Committee: budget estimates 2013-14 (part 2) – Delivered in Parliament 12 Dec 2013
Mr Pallas(Tarneit) — I rise to speak on part 2 of the Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (PAEC) report on the 2013-14 budget estimates. Specifically I will make some observations about the way the coalition government has been dealing with debt.
Often the quality of public debate about debt does our democracy a disservice. State debt is an extraordinarily complex issue, which makes it much easier to resort to sloganeering than talking intelligently. Let me be clear: Victorian Labor does not have a problem with public debt per se, but we are also committed to managing the economy responsibly, which means recognising that there is a limit to how much the state should borrow and being honest about what the debt is for.
The previous government decreased state debt, and the coalition inherited a debt level of $8 billion, or 2.5 per cent of gross state product (GSP). Since then, this government has run up the bill to $15.6 billion. It intends to borrow another $10 billion over the forward estimates period, increasing state debt to 6.6 per cent of GSP.
What Labor really abhors is dishonest debt. The Napthine government would have people believe that it sees public debt as a cardinal sin. Yet through creative accounting and bookkeeping tricks, it has been steadily ramping up our state debt. Chapter 5 of the report, starting at page 87 and entitled ‘Borrowings, debt and liabilities’, contains some alarming observations about this government’s approach to managing financial liabilities. For example, at page 88 the committee decries the lack of transparency shown by this government, saying it:
- … does not present any interim net debt targets which could be used to assess the extent to which the current plans align with the … target.
True to form, the government rejected the recommendation of the committee. At page 94 the report highlights the fact that the government has been forcing public non-financial corporations (PNFC) to borrow money through burdensome dividend policies. It states:
- PNFC sector borrowings and net debt are expected to increase over the forward estimates period —
and —
- The committee notes that the government has committed to increasing its role as ‘an active shareholder of public commercial entities’ …
The PAEC report was released in October this year, and this was not the first or the last time the government has been warned about the risks it is running. Shuffling money around the state of Victoria through its books in an attempt to conceal massive increases in government debt is having a seriously damaging effect on our financial position.
Most recently the Auditor-General highlighted the fact that in order to pay the $1.2 billion in dividends that the state demanded from PNFCs it was being forced to borrow money. This government’s addiction to gouging public corporations for dividends, shifting the financial pressure to bodies like water corporations and WorkCover that should use that money for the public good, is extraordinary to behold. The coalition has increased dividends from public corporations by 300 per cent. In the 2012-13 period — —
Ms Asher — On a point of order, Acting Speaker.
I am happy to stop the clock at the Chair’s discretion. Whilst I am loath to interrupt a 5-minute presentation, and I am well aware that the member for Tarneit indicated a parliamentary report at the beginning of his contribution, he is now straying further than that parliamentary report and giving a set speech. I ask you to call him back to order.
Mr Pallas — On the point of order, Acting Speaker, if the member had been listening, I was referring to chapter 5, starting at page 87, which deals specifically with the net debt targets, together with use of dividends by the government. I am talking directly to the issue of dividends. Short of just quoting the reports, I cannot see how I can do any more to extrapolate on the comments in the report.
Mr Pallas — Thank you, Acting Speaker. What we have seen, as the committee has indicated, is increasing concern relating to the increase in state debt. That $1.2 billion goes straight into propping up the coalition’s surplus, which at $316 million is wafer thin by comparison with the consistent and long-term surpluses of the previous government. There is foolish pride associated with this government’s efforts to extol its surpluses when the average operating net result between 2000 and 2010 shows that the previous government provided a surplus of $1 billion per annum.
The only time a Labor surplus was anywhere near as low as the current government’s was at the height of the global financial crisis in 2008-09. There is something extraordinarily crass about the government talking up its economic rationalism as if it is in some way due credit for this.
I hope the government heeds the recommendations of the Public Accounts and Estimates Committee, the Auditor-General, the public finance experts, the business community and countless others about the way it has been mismanaging debt. This government should not be in the business of taking a bow when economic growth is growing at a full percentage point less than the decade average, when there are 40 000 more unemployed Victorians than when it took office and when it has managed to triple state debt.