East-west link – Matter of Public Importance – Delivered in Parliament 4 Sept 2013
Mr Pallas (Tarneit) — It gives me great pleasure to speak in support of the matter of public importance.
The government only gave its business case to Infrastructure Victoria seven weeks after it had announced it was going to proceed with this project, so when it comes to thinking, this government did the walking before it did the thinking; effectively it put the project before the methodology, the thinking, the rationale. That is the basic problem. This is a cart-before-the-horse government. This is a project-before-priority-and-principles government. The Premier has said that if only Kevin Rudd stood at the end of the Eastern Freeway, he would get out his cheque book. I doubt he would, because if you had to decide how to spend, in a consolidated sense, up to $8 billion of taxpayers money, would this be the project you would spend it on?
It turned out that Tony Abbott, who never met a road he did not like, but does not care one jot for public transport — the man about whom the Premier said, ‘Do not worry about Tony, he will be right’ — put him back in his place and told him exactly what he could do about improving public transport under a future federal Liberal government. The Premier can say all he wants about his great love and affection for public transport and how he is going to go about implementing Labor’s strategy for a Melbourne Metro rail tunnel and other critically important public transport projects, but words matter not.
This government must be judged on its actions, and its actions reveal nothing but boorish, unsophisticated thinking. That is the sort of thing we have come to expect from this government and from this Treasurer, who today described the opposition as producing ‘kindergarten economics’.
This came from the Peter Pan of Treasury, the boy who never grew up, the Melbourne University Liberal Club debating society chair, the man who tripled state debt under this government’s watch and who has effectively seen state debt grow from $8 billion to $25 billion in projected out years. What an outrage! At the same time all the opportunities and costs of the future of Victoria are put into this one misguided project that will not ultimately do the things the government says it will.
How do we know that? We listen to the experts. Those opposite do not, but we do. When the government was told not to prioritise this project, it did not listen. When the Linking Melbourne Authority went to the minister in early 2011 and said, ‘Do not build from the east, build from the west, that is where the priority lies’, the government did not listen. When Sir Rod Eddington said, ‘Do not build from the east, build from the west, that is where the priority lies’, it did not listen. Who were government members listening to?
When the chief modeller of transport at VicRoads basically said, ‘I am not going down for this. I am not going to be held accountable in court when somebody loses their money on this flawed project’, what did they say? They basically said, ‘We are not listening to you either’.
This is a government of kindergarten economics and schoolboy politics. This is a government that is not planning for the future; it is planning for the next election. Victorians will hold it to account. There is a process for deciding what large projects deserve to be funded and this government has shown absolute contempt for that process. The Premier did not submit the business case for this $8 billion project until June, seven weeks after he had announced he was going to build it. When he did submit the business case he included wider economic benefits against the advice of Infrastructure Australia. Infrastructure Australia is not convinced that this project will, in its words, ‘deliver benefits exceeding the costs incurred’.
The Premier stood on the footpath at the end of the Eastern Freeway and said he is going to fix the congestion. Who, apart from the opposition, says this project will not fix it? VicRoads says it will not fix it. Earlier today we heard the Minister for Roads in this place saying that there is a discredited Hoddle Street study. He did not read it. Like everything else this government goes about, it has gone about this project in a half-baked fashion. It did not read the study. What did the preliminary Hoddle Street study, the redacted access to information study that this government makes available to people, say? In the terms of that report it said that the Eastern Freeway to Tullamarine Freeway tunnel connection will not fix congestion on Hoddle Street. That is what the report said — that it will not fix congestion on the Eastern Freeway at Hoddle Street.
All of those people sitting in their cars and waiting for relief while this government prances around telling them it has a solution for congestion need to know that this game-changing, congestion-busting, boondoggle the government is advocating will not do it.
Who said those words? It was VicRoads. Essentially this is a concept from a government that does not understand the opportunity cost of what it is doing. On this side of the chamber we can walk, we can chew gum and we can think as well. Members of this government might be able to walk and chew gum, chew cud or whatever it is they do, but they do not think about the consequences of their actions. We need an integrated transport system where planning comes ahead of project commitment.
The spending of $8 billion on one dud tunnel is a pretty serious opportunity cost loss. No amount of inane bleating and sloganising about how this is a game-changer can obscure the fact that infrastructure planning is not a game and that the vast majority of Victorians are going to miss out because of this decision. Last month the Auditor-General alerted Victorians to the urgent need to provide adequate transport infrastructure to the outer suburbs.
There is a $6.2 billion backlog in rail infrastructure and a $5 billion backlog in road infrastructure, and this dud tunnel will do nothing to fix that. Worse than that, this tunnel will suck away the opportunity to address the needs of the transport poor. We are told there could be as many as 3200 jobs created in this up to $8 billion project. If we do the maths, that is $2.5 million per job. To put it another way, it is 33 times the average wage of an Australian worker. What a brilliant job-generating project that is. It would have to be the most expensive ever job-generating infrastructure project in the world.
When this government came to office it promised no secrecy and no spin. What have we seen? We have basically seen government members wander around pretending that there is some unanimous view supporting this tunnel. I know of at least one member of the government who has a contrary view to the government. Mr Andrew Elsbury, a member for Western Metropolitan Region in the Council, was quoted in the Brimbank Leader as saying:
- … I hope that the minister –that is the Minister for Roads — and those planning this vital project –the east-west link — recognise the benefits that starting in the west can bring to the project …
That man should be the Premier. He is a genius. He is the Uncle Tom of the Liberal Party. The Liberal Party put him into the western suburbs to pretend that it has even the scantest bit of concern for people in the west. It does not. It uses them up, it chews them up and it disregards them.
Let us talk a little about mandates. Before the last election the now Premier said that in effect talk of a mandate in regard to constitutional reform was rubbish. Although it was part of the Labor Party’s policy before that election, he said it was not on the coalition’s political agenda. What do we say about a government that when it was in opposition came to the election and said, ‘You can’t drive yourself out of problems. We have no plans for an east-west policy’? Even when its members were in government they said they had no plans for that tunnel. This is a government that lied to the Victorian people and cannot be trusted, and it will be held to account for this boondoggle.