Roads: truck exclusion lanes – Adjournment Speech delivered in Parliament 28 March 2012
Mr PALLAS (Tarneit) — The matter I wish to raise is for the Minister for Roads. The action I seek is that the minister conclude the review into truck exclusion lanes and make public its conclusions to provide the public with an appreciation of how the lanes are working and whether they are to be extended.
The former government identified and rolled out two truck exclusion lanes, one on the Princes Highway between Laverton and Avalon and a second on the Eastern Freeway. It foreshadowed further rollouts, including the Monash-West Gate, the M1; EastLink; and eventually, upon works completion, the Western Ring Road, the M80. The Premier, who was then the Leader of the Opposition, criticised these car-only lanes in a trucking industry magazine on 4 March 2010, saying that the ‘choice of roads’ to be included was a ‘recipe for disaster’.
Connect East, the concession holder for EastLink, is on the public record as supporting the extension of car-only lanes to EastLink. With the completion of works on the Ml, there is no reason why truck exclusion lanes cannot be extended to that road. The Labor opposition’s road safety policy, Below 200 by 2020, released in June 2011, calls on the Baillieu government to continue the:
- … rollout of truck exclusion lanes on freeways and highways with three lanes or more …
With Victoria’s road toll now standing at 12 per cent above last year’s in a year-to-date context, now is the time for the government to continue the promised car-only-lane safety initiatives. An analysis of the Victorian road fatalities map, which is available on the Victoria Police website, reveals that there have been no fatalities on the two sections of highway currently set aside as truck exclusion lanes since they were declared.
Also, Transport Accident Commission statistics indicate that 78 per cent of truck casualty incidents in Victoria since 1987 have involved a collision with another vehicle — that is, trucks involved in the collision — and 37 per cent were in speed zones greater than 90 kilometres per hour. The Minister for Roads must explain to the Victorian public why the government to date has refused to continue Australia’s first truck exclusion rollout, which was started by Labor, which clearly yielded a safety dividend and which is certainly demonstrating its worth in European countries.
I note that at the annual Australian Roads Summit on 8 March the minister indicated that he had extended in January of this year the length of road space that road trains could use on the Victorian arterial road network from 60 kilometres to 360 kilometres. This sixfold increase brings with it an obligation to invest in the necessary infrastructure and to balance the safety needs of all other road users.
The previous Labor government sought to balance the needs of the community, the safety of road users and the efficiency of freight operators. I urge the government to ensure that it is balancing the safety needs of all road users before providing access to our road network for bigger and heavier trucks.